Resources
We provide tools and guidance for state and local election officials, law enforcement leaders, pro-democracy partners, the press, and the public. Our resources focus on election protection, accountability, truth in elections, and preventing political violence.
-
Issue
-
Resource Type
-
State
-
Entity
Amicus Briefs
February 14, 2023
Mason v. State of Texas – Voting Rights (TX)
TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Cases
February 1, 2023
Hobbs v. Crosby – Certification of Results (AZ)
COCHISE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cases
February 1, 2023
Chapman v. Berks County Board of Elections – Refusal to Certify (PA)
COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cases
February 1, 2023
Montgomery County BOE v. Secretary – Dating of Mail-in Ballots (PA)
COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cases
February 1, 2023
Finchem v. Fontes – 2022 Election Contest (AZ)
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; ARIZONA SUPREME COURT
Cases
February 1, 2023
Hamadeh v. Mayes; Kentch v. Mayes – 2022 Election Contest (AZ)
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT; MOHAVE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Amicus Briefs, Cases, Ethics and Regulatory Complaints
February 1, 2023
Legal Tracker
Through our legal work, we support states, counties, and cities as they fight to protect the freedom to vote and our nonpartisan election system. We provide pro bono counsel to state and local officials, share research and guidance, and file amicus briefs on behalf of bipartisan voices. We represent states as they defend strong voting laws, the security and integrity of our elections systems, and the will of the people.
Cases
January 18, 2023
AZ GOP v. Hobbs – Early Voting and Elections Procedures Manual (AZ)
ARIZONA SUPREME COURT (CASE NO. CV-22-0048-SA), MOHAVE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (CASE NO. S8015CV2022-00594) COURT OF APPEALS, DIV ONE (CASE NO.1 CA-CV-22-0388); ARIZONA SUPREME COURT (CASE NO. T-22-0003-CV)
Reports
December 14, 2022
A Democracy Crisis in the Making Report Update: 2022 Year-End Numbers
The state legislature-driven election subversion trend gained momentum throughout the last two years. All told, we have catalogued more than 400 legislative proposals that would enable election subversion. Over that time, the proposals have morphed and become more far-reaching and aggressive.